Jump to content

Talk:Anggun

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleAnggun has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 18, 2012Good article nomineeListed

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:23, 9 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA concerns

[edit]

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria. Some of my concerns are listed below:

  • There are several very large paragraphs in the article, which makes the prose hard to read. I suggest that these are broken up into smaller paragraphs.
  • At over 14,000 words, this article is WP:TOOBIG. There is way too much detail in this article and a subject-matter expert needs to severely trim the content.

Is anyone interested in addressing the above concerns, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 01:58, 27 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

[edit]
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result pending

There are several very large paragraphs in the article, which makes the prose hard to read. I suggest that these are broken up into smaller paragraphs. At over 14,000 words, this article has too much detail and is WP:TOOBIG. A subject-matter expert could severely trim the content. There are some uncited statements. Z1720 (talk) 02:18, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've shortened the article by 20%, splitting off the absurdly long philanthropy chapter, copy-editing, cutting off-topic materials (like lists of other performers), and removing uncited claims. If anybody wants to go further, they're welcome. Chiswick Chap (talk) 15:49, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Chiswick Chap's edits have resolved the size concerns: thanks for your work. The "Accolades" is almost entirely uncited, and also uses IMDB references which should be removed. Z1720 (talk) 16:56, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:10, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Most of the accolades were removed, but if there's no source for it, they shouldn't be there. Z1720 (talk) 17:26, 23 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]